Saving Court Reporting
- susan4448
- Oct 1
- 4 min read
By stenoimperium on August 23, 2025 The legal world has spent years debating artificial intelligence and digital recording in courtrooms. And with good reason. Accuracy, privacy, and accountability are not luxuries; they are the bedrock of justice. Human court reporters remain the gold standard for preserving the record. But while we fight Silicon Valley’s latest experiment, another crisis is starving our profession from within: the collapse of the education pipeline. Without new blood entering the field, no defense of “the record” will matter—because there will be no one left to keep it. The Disappearing Schools Court reporting programs across the country are closing. Community colleges have dropped their degrees, citing low enrollment, high equipment costs, retiring instructors, and budget shortfalls. One school in Sarasota shuttered its program after years of struggling with recruitment. Another, in Wisconsin, closed its department entirely after decades of producing certified reporters. This is the quiet erosion of our profession. Every time a school closes, dozens—sometimes hundreds—of potential reporters lose the chance to discover a career that could change their lives. And what has been done to stop it? Not nearly enough. Our leadership has been slow to respond, failing to “triage” schools at risk, failing to rally communities and state legislators, and failing to show deans why court reporting is a workforce program worth saving. A Lesson from Kusadasi, Turkey Yesterday, in Kusadasi, Turkey, I heard a story that hit me like a bolt of recognition. Our tour guide explained how the ancient craft of carpet weaving is dying. For centuries, Turkish carpets were prized worldwide, each one a work of art made by hand. But today’s youth no longer want to learn the trade. They want to be doctors, lawyers, teachers—prestigious professions that promise more stability and income. The government, realizing the cultural treasure at risk, is now offering incentives for students to learn carpet weaving. Because if no one learns the craft, it will vanish forever. Machines can mass-produce rugs, yes, but they cannot reproduce the artistry, precision, and soul of a handmade carpet. Sound familiar? Court reporting faces the exact same fate. We are the human craft preserving the truth in our justice system. And unless we recruit and support the next generation, we too will be replaced—not because machines are better, but because no one is left to carry the torch. Rethinking Standards, Lowering Barriers Part of the problem is our own pipeline. Some schools demand five perfect passes at 225 words per minute before graduation. Admirable in theory, but how many capable students have been forced out because they couldn’t quite hit that benchmark before their funding or patience ran out? Many of these students later pass the RPR or state exams in months. The rigid structure of schools may be unintentionally gatekeeping rather than cultivating. Maybe it’s time to modernize: lower graduation benchmarks to 200 wpm while keeping the professional certification bar at 225+. That way, schools can graduate more students who are on the cusp of readiness while still ensuring professional standards are met. The focus should be on building reporters, not building attrition statistics. Recruitment - Who Even Knows We Exist? Another brutal truth: most young people—and their parents—don’t even know this career exists. Ask a high school student if they’ve heard of court reporting, and you’ll likely get a blank stare. Meanwhile, they’re bombarded with campaigns to become nurses, engineers, or software developers. We need the same energy. Recruitment must be aggressive, creative, and digital-first. Imagine:
If we want to fill the seats, we must first make sure students even know the seats exist. Innovation Isn’t AI—It’s Education Ironically, the real innovation our profession needs has nothing to do with AI. It’s not about cloud transcription or voice recognition software. It’s about reimagining how we teach, recruit, and retain the next generation. Innovation looks like:
This isn’t lowering the bar. It’s lowering the barriers. The Dual Fight Yes, we must continue exposing AI’s failures in accuracy, privacy, and accountability. But if that is our only focus, we risk winning the argument and losing the war. Because without reporters entering the pipeline, there will be no one left to take the depositions, cover the hearings, or produce the transcripts that justice depends on. We must fight on two fronts: against the incursion of unproven technology, and for the preservation of our schools, students, and future workforce. A Call to Action The story of Turkish carpets is a cautionary tale: once a craft disappears, it is nearly impossible to bring back. Court reporting is no different. We are not “just typists.” We are custodians of truth. So here is the call:
Because once our profession is gone, it’s gone for good. And what will be left behind will not be faster, cheaper, or better. It will be weaker, riskier, and less accountable. Just like the hand-woven carpets of Turkey, our craft is too valuable to lose. The time to fight for it is now. |
---|
Comments